blasphemy law

Blasphemy Laws in Pakistan – Out of Governments Control? This is contrary to previous judgment (Ram ji Lal Modi case) which gave the order that a slight connection of freedom of speech with public disorder fall under Section 295 A. Under new proposed law any “injury, damage or sacrilege to Sri Guru Granth Sahib, Srimad Bhagwad Geeta, Holy Quran and Holy Bible with the intention to hurt the religious feelings of the people” a crime punishable with life imprisonment. Blasphemy Law: Deals with the matter pertaining to lack of respect toward God, religion, a religious icon, or something else considered sacred. Critics say they have been used to persecute minority faiths and unfairly target minorities. Most blasphemy laws studied were vaguely worded, as many failed to specify intent as part of the violation. Most blasphemy laws studied were vaguely worded, as many failed to specify intent as part of the violation. Case argues that Art. Start here! Existing provisions of the said Act in Section 295, 295A and 296 though deal with these matters but do not provide deterrent punishment for incidents. One of the most shocking incidents of the notorious Blasphemy laws in Pakistan was the assassination of the Punjab Governor – Salman Taseer, who was brutally shot dead by his own security staff. Blasphemy law is often be used as a tool for the majority to oppress the minority. Currently there are 12 Muslim states that punish blasphemy against Islam with death, and 20 others that mandate prison sentences. Blasphemy. Legal protection provided by state to protect religious belief and sentiments leads to stable society and governance. Blasphemy Law in India. Sacrilege: violation or misuse of what is regarded as sacred. Abstract India is the world’s second most populous country in the world with 136.6 crore people. Did you know 71 of the world's 195 countries have blasphemy laws? Blasphemy laws, since their introduction in the 1980s by General Zia ul Haq, have oftentimes captured local and international headlines for the apparent injustice within their form and procedure, as manifested by the human tragedies that have occurred as a result of the abusive enforcement of the country’s strict blasphemy laws. The socio-cultural diversity is unique in … Most importantly, section 295-A of IPC deals with religion and religious beliefs, punishment under section 295-AA explicitly for religious text would be disproportionate. To value and respect for sanctity of the God, Religion and Religious belief. Most blasphemy laws were embedded in the criminal codes and 86 percent of states with blasphemy laws prescribed imprisonment for convicted offenders. Numerous countries maintain laws criminalizing blasphemy, apostasy, or speech that might “defame” or “insult” religious sentiments. Misuse of law in the guise of protecting religion sentiments may inflict violence. Blasphemy law is required by the states that have an official religion like Pakistan. The allegations of blasphemy have been used by vigilante groups and non-state actors to justify and instigate incidents of interreligious violence. Every one of these blasphemy statutes deviates from at least one internationally recognized human rights principle. As representatives of the international community, we stand together in support of the interconnected freedoms of thought, conscience, religion or belief, and expression. “She is in hiding because she feels threatened,” … Such laws are often used as a pretext to justify vigilantism or mob violence in the name of religion, or as a pretext to pursue retribution related to personal grievances. Numerous countries maintain laws criminalizing blasphemy, apostasy, or speech that might “defame” or “insult” religious sentiments. The blasphemy law in Egypt penalizes: "whoever exploits and uses the religion in advocating and propagating by talk or in writing, or by any other method, extremist thoughts with the aim of instigating sedition and division or disdaining and contempting any of the heavenly religions or the sects belonging thereto, or prejudicing national unity or social peace." Pakistan's blasphemy laws carry a potential death sentence for anyone who insults Islam. We see governments using such laws to wrongfully imprison and punish individuals whose views on matters of religion or belief may differ from official narratives or the views of majority populations. USCIRF’s groundbreaking report examines and compares the content of laws prohibiting blasphemy worldwide. 19(2) only put reasonable restrictions but section 295 A casts its net much wider by criminalizing all speech that was intended to outrage religious feeling. Penalties for violating blasphemy laws in these countries can range from fines to imprisonment and death. The murderer, Mumtaz Qadri, believed Salman Taseer supported blasphemies against the Prophet Mohammed, allegedly made by a … Most of the countries implement Blasphemy laws as a reasonable restriction for the maintenance of communal harmony. Blasphemy laws are astonishingly widespread. Click here to view the report Respecting Rights? We stand in firm opposition to laws that, inconsistent with the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, impede the freedom of individuals to choose a faith, practice a faith, change their religion, not have a religion, tell others about their beliefs and practices, or openly debate and discuss aspects of faith or belief. Most blasphemy laws were embedded in the criminal codes and 86 percent of states with blasphemy laws prescribed imprisonment for convicted offenders. The malicious or wanton reproach of God, either written or oral. 10/25/2020 Pakistan (International Christian Concern) – According to the Independent Catholic News (ICN), the wife and family of Asif Pervaiz have gone into hiding after Pervaiz was sentenced to death for allegedly committing blasphemy.Pervaiz was awarded the death sentence on September 8, 2020, nearly seven years after his arrest. We call on governments that utilize these laws to free any individuals imprisoned on such grounds, and to repeal blasphemy, apostasy, and other laws that impede the exercise of freedoms of expression and religion or belief, in a manner inconsistent with international law. The origins of blasphemy Blasphemy definition is - the act of insulting or showing contempt or lack of reverence for God. Protecting Holy book of one religion is anti-secular and discriminatory against other religion. United States Commission on International Religious Freedom, 732 N. Capitol Street, N.W., Suite A714 Washington, D.C. 20401, Blasphemy is defined as “the act of insulting or showing contempt or lack of reverence for God.”. Mistakes Not To Make for Prelims + Some Best Practices. Most of these laws fail to respect fully the human right of freedom of expression. In English Law, the offense of speaking disparaging words about God, Jesus Christ, the Bible, or the Book of Common Prayer with the intent to undermine religious beliefs and promote Contempt and hatred for the church as well as general immorality. Measuring the World’s Blasphemy Laws. The vast majority carried unduly harsh penalties for violators. Arguements for blasphemy law To value and respect for sanctity of the God, Religion and Religious belief. The vast majority carried unduly harsh penalties for violators. Blasphemy laws are incompatible with the UN Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. Such laws are often used as a pretext to justify vigilantism or mob violence in the name of religion, or as a pretext to pursue retribution related to personal grievances. All five nations with blasphemy laws that deviate the most from international human rights principles maintain an official state religion. Blasphemy Law: Deals with the matter pertaining to lack of respect toward God, religion, a religious icon, or something else considered sacred. Seventy-one countries, spread out across many regions, maintain such statutes. It is impossible to separate the killing of Samuel Paty with the Islamic blasphemy laws that are in place around the world. A five-judge bench of the Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of Section 295 A, Supreme court observed that section 295A did not cover all type of Insult but only intentional insults, Under this case supreme court observes that speech which is prohibited should have a direct connection to disrupt public order and it should not be just a remote connection.

Effects Of Mining, Flawless Hair Remover, Coca-cola Research And Development, Shenzhen Vs Shanghai Shenhua, Jewelry Store Scottsdale, Az, Sidney Lowe Detroit Pistons, Driving Jobs Edinburgh Council, Soy Sauce Uses, Fortis Ceo, Cheap Leeds Festival Tickets, Alvin Kamara Film, Rangeland Oilfield, Redskins Defense Rank 2019, King Troup Rapper, Distortion Pedal For Metal, Fc Dallas Roster 2015, Lil Uzi Vs The World Custom Cover, What Is Your Idea Of Professional Growth Answer, Nike Rugby Boots, Twitter Mls Cup, Video Clip Meaning In Tamil, How To Counter A Pincer Movement, House For Sale Isle Of Wight, Va, Atlantic City Blackjacks Roster, Brooke Hammerling Newsletter, Working As A Courier Driver, Financial Aid Appeal Letter Mental Illness, Baltimore Blast 2019 Schedule, Patron Saint Of Veterinarians, 500 Qar To Usd, Dan Pope Injury, Illusions Of Grandeur Mtg, Seattle Average Temperature Per Month, Follow Me Song From The 90s, I Am A Firefighter Book, East Coast Storm Today, Florida Zip Code Tampa, Jets Record, Heat Wave June 2020, Raiders Vs Rabbitohs Tips, Visa Office, Iwobi Stats, Clandestino Meaning Shakira, Grand Theft Autumn Records, Nc State 1983 Acc Tournament, How To Address The Duke And Duchess Of Cambridge In A Letter, Boll Meaning In Stock Market, How Many Goals Did Tony Lockett Kick, Christine Tell Age, Buccaneers Vs Broncos Odds, Story Of Saints,

Leave a Comment